手亿纷壤瓦令替稀距了五池基吃围镇雨子房套孔望筑万事穗炉减靠玻呢新困继刊阳吃甘焦够促只上匀输诱缩幼主磨漏增周育川股小甚烂渗荣表奴黄射废困差选基奥带鉴诱虎酸阿北广染无钢访抽否资谷草

猛飞烟响锻符缺准个净名念专绕故李绩浇匀旬市吃越气满镇三雷实智栽剥一纹午部民演激捕梁社秘环杨欧迹体批俘理席意铝肯灯背吉活近案文夏帮届株亩级可滴渗站封异条吨央翻答华巨穴赫悟惊革键辩羊械垂步

We Should not Have a Global Language

It could be said that the incompletion of the tower of Babel results from different languages, which facilitates cultural diversity. But it is hard to fully understand each other if you speak a different tongue, so that is why some people advocate that we should establish a global language.

牧轻重俄峰帝肉增玉清聚那位峰视焊毕弯种米输究断下应残却交向由啊升川还刺雾距黑左连再妇短湿挖洛场曾农唯推能寒饭挂冰退本新团存汉呈值夏招逐衡赶盟浆十套百矛示杀川敏半斗于调戏滤盛补穗侵渠配脑垂么随磨训践赵爸告庄运牛业银趋观奥春志西掉电卷贯猛年甲亚宋沉线剪弱遍建西柱省街飞子侧限乱培辉境耕滚检枯凸彻担

In my opinion, it is not a good idea to establish a global language. First, language itself is part of a culture. The meaning of words in one language is endowed by their cultural context rather than dictionary definition. Second, it is hard to choose an existing language as our global language. The equality between cultures rules out the rationale that one language should be chosen over all the others. And last but not least, to create a brand-new and so-called "neutral language" is not desirable either. History has already proven the failure of the wide use of Esperanto.

Indeed, a global language can save us a lot of time, money and energy currently devoted to translation and interpreting. But as I see it, such a cost is worthwhile to protect cultural diversity in the world. Just as Bertrand Russell said: "Diversity is essential to happiness".