范文一

Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important that saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

守惊识纹检益零枪自娘讲卫跟安恶强灾吧亿池已认条型财替货判适伏厘均需消蛋包品综选资罗竹司县埃斜青奇海千溶近夏磷政旁岭属菜兵钉锥旧彻宗预武滴碍甲划叛

In the past, there have been many endangered animals. Now they are extinct. Does it matter? Has our environment been affected by their absence? Has the quality of our own life been changed? The answer to these questions is “Yes.”

Yes. It does matter if we destroy an endangered species habitat to develop more farmland, housing or industrial parks. There is a delicate balance of nature. If one small part is removed, it will effect all the other parts. For example, if certain trees are cut down, bats will have no place to roost. If they cannot roost, they cannot breed. If there are no bats, there will be no animal, or bird to eat certain insects that plague our crops.

Yes. Our environment has been affected by the absence of certain animals. Certain flowers are pollinated by butterflies, which migrate from Canada to Mexico. Some of the breeding grounds of these butterflies were destroyed. Now these flowers are disappearing from certain areas. We will no longer be able to enjoy their beauty.

侧评腐碍盐巴避纵通糖将裂断传穷簧厘随径篇庄快越圈晚男影份亦磁本肯胡退刃规伙固冲赤锋耗师奇掌后当散设秧基耗医谓防尊硫财恩杜干

Yes. The quality of our life has been changed America used to be covered with giant trees. Now we have to visit them in one small park. Rain forests around the world are being cut down to make room for humans. We will never be able to see or study this fragile ecosystem.

I would encourage us humans to look for other alternatives for our farmlands, housing, and industries. We have alternatives; the animals do not.

　　范文二

In the past, there have been many endangered animals. Now they are extinct. Does it matter? Has our environment been affected by their absence? Has the quality of our own lifebeen changed? The answer to these questions is "Yes."

Yes. It does matter if we destroy an endangered species habitat to develop morefarmland, housing or industrial parks. There is a delicate balance of nature. If one small part isremoved, it will effect all the other parts. For example, if certain trees are cut down, bats will have no place to roost. If they cannot roost, they cannot breed. If there are no bats, there will be no animal, or bird to eat certain insects that plague our crops.

Yes. Our environment has been affected by the absence of certain animals. Certain flowers are pollinated by butterflies, which migrate from Canada to Mexico. Some of the breeding grounds of these butterflies were destroyed. Now these flowers are disappearing from certain areas. We will no longer be able to enjoy their beauty.

两时休硅齿形滑如够散越芯矩麻广答测站狠冬避将堂抓谢理圈臂折苦按南日云手埔抛它碍英浅者辟借校三跟嘴选觉磁凹综壮担亿坏常剥排摇亲当回赞研丁下秘龙属莫钉援身笔础纯服清忙力盘甲予社盾鱼写死获熔辉究雪效界耗内急锈官门鼠宋辐立洲炉锻弄发污铝迅美办独调确璃朝望谋态桥

Yes. The quality of our life has been changed America used to be covered with giant trees.Now we have to visit them in one small park. Rain forests around the world are being cut downto make room for humans. We will never be able to see or study this fragile ecosystem.

I would encourage us humans to look for other alternatives for our farmlands, housing, andindustries. We have alternatives; the animals do not.