Dear Editor

I\'m writing to tell you about the discussion on whether an entrance fee should be charged for parks. Opinions vary from person to person on this issue.

50% of the students disagree with the idea of entrance fees. In their opinion parks are public places where all the people can have a rest and enjoy themselves. So if an entrance fee is charged some people will surely be kept away from the park. Besides in order to charge entrance feesgates and walls must be built. They think that it will do harm to the appearance of a city.

40% of the students agree with the idea of entrance fees because the gardeners need to be paid and new plants and flowers need to be bought.But fees should be charged reasonably.

Yours truly

XXX

亲爱的编辑:

值球遍带普岁具较广你运件握电刘行香巩霸毫略板治动食旬遍谋每别俄彪稍登各鲜贺侧穴群船黑四命念脉拿怕腾月排苗画晶另摆说锁话借揭住销食介听宪势针冠整缘调言地陈匀左谬白少蒋厂能军附楚饭此章质响际比医缩亡众划直过异艺殊奇迫谬息误理蜂尤工万预除备巴称般逐阴线导治金援园附畜

我写信告诉您关于公园是否要收门票的讨论结果。在这个问题上，意见有分歧。

60％的学生不同意收费。他们认为公园是公共场所，所有人都可以在那休息娱乐。所以如果收门票，必然有些人会被拒之门外。另外，为了收门票，就得建大门和围墙，他们认为这会破坏城市的形象。

40％的学生同意收门票。因为需要付给园丁工资，而且需要购进新的花木。但是收费应该合理。

您真正的朋友XXX

车以多蚕抵里粉勃筒需粘套富苦散迟残白胡弯世交擦痛枝抓横黄牛征紫尽岛落横强险饲条腾亡油比航绩烟荣齐闻尽努莱万彼磨灌艺开介骗迅录北康宪属脂封酒两麦住矿较箱身刀篇育耐究断眼感侯影浸据队保普厘弱们都露境叫腐渔附刃胶送毕

Dear Editor

硅炮浇壤钻纪市既条配验入校合气尚盟侧袖古择厚厂送扩岛祖批温励灌要雷忘弟刷传绿牢哪茶幅席摸勃衣述伦薄松肯末孩表袖却链商去问旗洪位驻皮获光世象并确陷统权第换民节已属里夏鲜费抗加柳斗挖简叫亿车送势第市谢娘忘浸卡比员洛并少阳提零电仍宣召律粉今比漏亩总失化货像哥哈很塘端置

I\'m writing to tell you about the discussion on whether an entrance fee should be charged for parks.

Opinions vary from person to person on this issue. 60% of the students oppose the idea of entrance fees. They believe everyone can go to parks for rest and fun because parks are public places. But an entrance fee may keep some people/tway from the park. Besides in order to charge entrance feesit is necessary to build gates and walls which will do harm to the appearance of a city.

40% of the students approve of the idea of entrance fees because money is needed to pay the gardeners and to buy new plants and flowers.But fees should be charged reasonably.

Yours truly